Readers of the blog come from all over the world and they
may have heard some surprising tidings from the United Kingdom over the last
few weeks. As most of international news reporting has painted events as either
a revolt by xenophobic peasants or just complete chaos, I thought it was worth
setting down what has really happened and the reasons behind it.
First, my biases. Although I am, I suppose, a member of the
globalised neo-liberal order, I campaigned hard in my local area for a vote to
leave the European Union, commonly called the EU, at the referendum on 23 June.
I have been a sceptic of the EU since 16 September 1992, ‘black Wednesday’ when
the German central bank provoked the markets to devalue the British pound
against the will of the British Government. In the meantime, we have seen the
EU bring in the single currency that, in the aftermath of the financial crisis
of 2008 has turned into a rack upon which the economies of many of its members
are slowly being broken. In essence, the EU has become an oligarchy, and not
even a very effective one.
Second, some history: back in 1975, the British
overwhelmingly endorsed their membership of the European Economic Community or
EEC, the predecessor organisation of the EU. On balance, the British decided
that membership of a huge market on their doorstep was worth sacrificing some
of their self-rule for. Besides, back in the 1970s, the UK was in a bad way,
with widespread labour disputes, high inflation and shaky Government finances.
However, in 1992, the EEC was turned into the European Union by the Maastricht Treaty, which was intended to be the first step towards a federal United States of Europe. The British Prime Minister at the time, John Major, declined to obtain a democratic mandate for this. The previous Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, had been deposed a couple of years before when she effectively threatened to veto the plans for a federal Europe. The combination of Maastricht and Black Wednesday turned the majority of the Conservative Party against the EU. They also destroyed the credibility of Mr Major and his Government, which lost the 1997 election by a landslide.
From 1997 to 2010, Tony Blair’s Labour Party was in Government and was determined that the UK would play a full part in the EU. In 2005, in an effort to increase the democratic legitimacy of the EU, a series of countries held referendums on its new constitutional treaty, which was a further step towards a federal Europe. However, when the EU lost the votes in France and the Netherlands, the results were ignored and the constitutional treaty was pushed through anyway with a different name. Both Mr Blair and the new Conservative leader, David Cameron, also promised a referendum on the constitutional treaty but both reneged when it became politically inconvenient to give the people a say. The grand plan to provide the EU with democratic legitimacy ended up destroying its credibility because the people declined to give the answer they were required to.
In 2013, now in Government, Mr Cameron again promised a
referendum. He said he would renegotiate the UK’s relationship with the EU
before the referendum and then ask the people if they wanted to Leave or Remain,
based on the new terms. He hinted that, if the negotiation didn’t go his way,
he might campaign to Leave. But when his negotiations duly failed to achieve
anything of substance in February 2016, he announced he would, after all,
campaign to Remain. His credibility as honest broker was instantly destroyed
and British voters stopped listening to a word he said. They also got sick of
every international bigwig, from President Obama downwards, telling the UK was
doomed if it voted to Leave.
On 23 June, we voted 17 million to 15 million to Leave the EU. Everything about the vote was a surprise. No one thought Leave would win. Even after the polls closed, the betting markets implied a 90% chance of a Remain vote. Turnout was 73%, the highest in a national vote for 25 years. In short, more of the British voted to Leave the EU than had ever voted for anything else in our history.
So what happened and what happens next? The Leave vote was a
coalition of three disparate groups. The campaign was led by a relatively small
group of internationalist libertarians, including Boris Johnson, Michael Gove
and Daniel Hannan. They saw the EU (correctly, in my view) as an
anti-democratic and corporatist racket that was immune to reform, as the
failure of Mr Cameron’s renegotiation had shown. The shock troops for Leave
were supporters of Nigel Farage and the UK Independence Party: mainly
paleo-conservatives who objected to uncontrolled immigration (the UK must
accept unlimited numbers of immigrants from the EU).
The third element of the coalition for Leave was whose
participation nobody could predict in advance. It was also the one that all my
local canvassing was aimed at winning over. This final group consisted of
working class people who nominally supported the Labour Party, but in practice
rarely voted. Sick and tired of being ignored, and not seeing the benefits of
globalisation, they came out to vote on 23 June and delivered the verdict of
Brexit.
Now the UK embarks on an exciting journey. We will continue
to trade freely with the EU, but also sign free trade deals with the rest of
the world as fast as we can. We’ll continue to welcome many new immigrants to
the UK, but they won’t have an automatic right to reside here. And the
democratic control of farm subsidies, fisheries and taxation (the UK currently
can’t even abolish the tax on sanitary towels) will return to Westminster. Of
course, plenty of the British have valid concerns about the effects of Brexit. And
it is to be expected that many people will have invested in the status quo of
EU membership, especially if the status quo has lasted for over 40 years. That
does not make it a good thing. Indeed, institutional inertia and the fear of short-term
consequences over long-term benefits is one of the most damaging of political
motivations.
As for the rest of the EU, it needs to reform quickly to
gain democratic legitimacy while also, somehow, undoing the immense damage done
by the single currency. Is that possible? Probably not. But we British wish the
EU well. With Brexit, we cease to be a truculent tenant and become a friendly
neighbour.
Discuss this post at the Quodlibeta Forum
